Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (0.78 seconds)

Rajendra Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh& Others on 8 August, 1996

24. The   'useless   formality'   theory,   it   must be noted, is an exception. Apart from   the   class   of   cases   of   "admitted   or  indisputable   facts   leading   only   to   one   conclusion"   referred   to   above,­   there   has   been considerable debate of the application   of   that   theory   in   other   cases.   The  divergent views expressed in regard to this   theory have been elaborately considered by   this Court in M.C. Mehta referred to above.   This Court surveyed the views expressed in   various judgments in England by Lord Reid,   Lord Wilberforce, Lord Woolf, Lord Bingham,   Megarry,   J.   and   Straughton   L.J.   etc.   in   various   cases   and   also   views   expressed   by   leading writers like Profs. Garner, Craig,   De.   Smith,   Wade,   D.H.   Clark   etc.   Some   of   them   have   said   that   orders   passed   in  violation   must   always   be   quashed   for   otherwise the Court will be prejudging the   issue. Some others have said, that there is   no such absolute rule and prejudice must be   Page 38 of 44 C/LPA/163/2018 JUDGMENT shown.   Yet,   some   others   have   applied   via­ media rules. We do not think it necessary,   in   this   case   to   go   deeper   into   these   issues.   In   the   ultimate   analysis,   it   may   depend on the facts of a particular case."
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 929 - B P Reddy - Full Document
1   2 3 Next