Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)
Sukhdev Singh Nagpal vs New Karian Pehalwan Cooperative ... on 25 April, 2017 cites

National Insurance Company Ltd., vs Dilbagh Singh Johal on 20 December, 2012

In case National Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr. v. Dilbagh Singh Johal & Ors. 2013 (1) CPJ 71, which was decided by this Commission, the same scheme was involved and the complainant had also taken treatment from the non-empanelled hospital, but the claim repudiated was held to be illegal and this Commission ordered for payment to the extent of expenses provided under the scheme. The said authority fully applies to the facts of the present case.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Waryam Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 21 September, 2015

17. The Division Bench of the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Waryam Singh v. State of Punjab 1996 (2) SCT 495 has held that right to life is not only to protect citizens from being killed, except in due course of law. The State cannot backtrack and deny the benefit of State Policy, providing medical assistance, which forms part of the right to life enshrined under Article 21. In the said case, an objection was taken by the respondent that before getting the treatment, prior approval was not taken nor the treatment was taken from the approved hospital and the reimbursement of medical expenses was declined. In that case also, the petitioner had undergone Coronary Angiography/Heart Bypass Surgery. The Division Bench First Appeal No.1105 of 2014 12 held that the petitioner is entitled to medical expenses, as are being charged by the Government and approved hospitals.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
1