Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.30 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 29 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
The Trade Marks Act, 1999
Section 2 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 29 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Laxmikant V.Patel vs Chetanbhat Shah & Anr on 4 December, 2001
35. Thus, an action for infringement of trademark or more of
passing off will lie wherever the defendant's product's name, or
its intended name, is calculated to deceive, and so to divert
business from the plaintiff, or to occasion a confusion between
the two businesses. Honesty and fair play are, and ought to be,
the basic policies in the world of business . When a person adopts
or intends to adopt a name in connection with his business or
services which already belongs to someone else, it results in
confusion and has propensity of diverting the customers and
clients of someone else to himself and thereby resulting in injury
(Laxmikant V. Patel Vs. Chetanbhai Shah and Anothers (2002)
Supreme Court Cases 65)
Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma vs Navaratna Pharmaceutical ... on 20 October, 1964
36. As was observed in Kavi Raj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma
vs. Navaratna Pharmaceutical Laboratories, AIR 1965 SC 980
and in National Bell Co. v. Metal Goods Mfg. Co., AIR 1971 SC
898:
National Bell Co. & Anr vs Metal Goods Mfg. Co. (P) Ltd. & Anr on 18 March, 1970
36. As was observed in Kavi Raj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma
vs. Navaratna Pharmaceutical Laboratories, AIR 1965 SC 980
and in National Bell Co. v. Metal Goods Mfg. Co., AIR 1971 SC
898: