Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.30 seconds)The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934
Section 45 in The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
Article 215 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Contempt Of Courts Act, 1971
Small Industries Development Bank Of ... vs M/S Sibco Investment Pvt. Ltd. on 3 January, 2022
34. It was submitted that the directions
issued by RBI have statutory force as held by
the Apex Court in case of Small Industries
Development Bank of India v. SIBCO Investment
Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2022 SC OnLine SC 5
wherein the Apex Court has held that when the
legality of RBI notification is not under
challenge, relief cannot be granted without
determining its legality.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Gorkha Security Services vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 4 August, 2014
"(13.) The next question that arises
is whether an oral hearing is
required under the Revised Circular
dated 01.07.2015. We have already
seen that the said Circular makes a
departure from the earlier Master
Circular in that an oral hearing may
only be given by the First Committee
at the first stage if it is so found
necessary. Given the scheme of the
Revised Circular, it is difficult to
state that oral hearing is
mandatory. It is even more difficult
to state that in all cases oral
hearings must be given, or else the
principles of natural justice are
breached. A number of judgments have
held that natural justice is a
flexible tool that is used in order
that a person or authority arrive at
a just result. Such result can be
arrived at in many cases without
oral hearing but on written
representations given by parties,
after considering which, a decision
is then arrived at. Indeed, in a
recent judgment in Gorkha Security
Services v. Govt. (NCT of Delhi) and
Ors., (2014) 9 SCC 105, this Court
has held, in a blacklisting case,
that where serious consequences
ensue, once a show cause notice is
issued and opportunity to reply is
afforded, natural justice is
satisfied and it is not necessary to
give oral hearing in such cases."