Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.44 seconds)Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Etc vs State Of Punjab on 9 April, 1980
5. Learned advocate also relied upon the decision in the
case of Shri Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Ors. Vs. State of
Punjab reported in (1980) 2 Supreme Court Cases 565 and
submitted that liberal interpretation of Section 438 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure is required to be considered and
personal liberty cannot be whittled down.
Section 20 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 2 December, 2010
4. Learned advocate Mr. Agrawal for the applicant relied
upon the decision of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs.
State of Maharashtra and others reported in (2011)
Supreme Court Cases 694 and submitted that the protection
of right to personal liberty is required to be maintained. In that
case, it is held that exercise of jurisdiction requires maintaining
of perfect balance between two conflicting viz. sanctity or
individual liberty and interest of society.
The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 29 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
1