Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.42 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Arms Act, 1959
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Andhra ... on 6 December, 1977
In Gudikan Narasimhulu v Public Prosecutor, (1978) 1 SCC 240, (Para 16), Supreme
Court held that the delicate light of the law favors release unless countered by the
nega ve criteria necessita ng that course.
Prahlad Singh Bhati vs N.C.T., Delhi & Anr on 23 March, 2001
In Prahlad Singh Bha v NCT, Delhi, (2001) 4
SCC 280, Supreme Court highlighted one of the factors for bail to be the public or the
State's immense interest and similar other considera ons.
Sushila Aggarwal vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 29 January, 2020
In Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of
Delhi), 2020:INSC:106 [Para 92], (2020) 5 SCC 1, Para 92, the Cons tu onal Bench held
that unusually, subject to the evidence produced, the Courts can impose restric ve
condi ons.
Sumit Mehta vs State Of N.C.T. Of Delhi on 13 September, 2013
In Sumit Mehta v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi, (2013)15 SCC 570, Para 11,
Supreme Court holds that while exercising power Under Sec on 438 of the Code, the
Court is duty-bound to strike a balance between the individual's right to personal
freedom and the right of inves ga on of the police.
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Etc vs State Of Punjab on 9 April, 1980
In Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v State of Punjab, 1980 (2) SCC 565, (Para 30), a
Cons tu onal Bench of Supreme Court held that the bail decision must enter the
cumula ve effect of the variety of circumstances jus fying the grant or refusal of bail.
Vernon vs The State Of Maharashtra on 28 July, 2023
In Vernon v. The State of Maharashtra, 2023 INSC 655,
[para 45], while gran ng bail under Unlawful Ac vi es (Preven on) Act, 2002, Supreme
Court had directed imposi on of the similar condi on, which reads as follows, "(d) Both
the appellants shall use only one Mobile Phone each, during the me they remain on
bail and shall inform the Inves ga ng Officer of the NIA, their respec ve mobile
numbers."
Mohammed Zubair vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 20 July, 2022
In Mohammed Zubair v. State of NCT of Delhi, 2022:INSC:735 [Para
28], Writ Pe on (Criminal) No 279 of 2022, Para 29, decided on July 20, 2022, A Three-
Judge bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court holds that "The bail condi ons imposed by the
Court must not only have a nexus to the purpose that they seek to serve but must also
be propor onal to the purpose of imposing them. The courts while imposing bail
condi ons must balance the liberty of the accused and the necessity of a fair trial. While
doing so, condi ons that would result in the depriva on of rights and liber es must be
eschewed."