Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.22 seconds)

Sita Ram & Ors vs State Of U.P on 24 January, 1979

" To my mind the prosecution has failed to prove this charge because in his statement Ex. PW 6/A the complaintant has stated that when he entered in the house of Ram Karnan, Ashok accused came out from a room with a pistol and directed him (PW-6) to get lost from that place failing which he would finish him. This version is supported by PW-6 in his on oath statement. Except this evidence, no other evidence has come on the record. Therefore from this evidence it is clear that the threat uttered by accused Ashok to PW-6 was a conditional threat and nothing was done by the accused Ashok, even the witness did not follow his directions. Thus the conditional threat was no threat in the eyes of law and if any law on this point is required, then reference may be made to Sita Ram Vs. State 1974 P.L.R. 421. Thus viewed from every angle, I have come to the conclusion that the prosecution has not been able to prove the second charge i.e. charge under Section 506 Indian Penal Code, against the accused persons."
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 173 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1