Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.57 seconds)Krishna Laxman Yadav And Ors. vs Narsinghrao Vithalrao Sonawane And ... on 2 March, 1972
9. What is lost sight of by the learned Judge is that the tenancy has not been determined. The plaint proceeds on a fundamental fallacy that on the destruction or collapse of the building, the tenancy came to an end. It is a settled principle of law, that mere destruction of the tenanted house by virtue of fire, flood, fall, or otherwise would not bring the tenancy to an end. See the case of Krishna Laxman Yadav v. Narsinghrao Vithalrao Sonawane, .
Sita Ram And Ors. vs Bashi Ram Gobind Singh on 8 September, 1961
In this connection, I may refer to the case of Sita Ram v. Ram Lal, reported in Indian Law Reports 18 All. 440, wherein the Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court has expressly negatived such a contention as advanced by the plaintiffs. The relevant portion is as follows:---
Section 12 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
1