Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.32 seconds)Section 20 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Jadunandan Prosad Singha vs Koer Kallyan Singh And Ors. on 24 August, 1911
13. One other question requires consideration, namely, whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief against the District Board by way of cross-objection to the decree in an appeal preferred by the other defendants. It need not be disputed that, as an ordinary rule, a respondent in an appeal is not entitled to urge cross-objections except as against the appellant : Bishun Chum Roy Chowdhry v. Jogendra Nath Roy 20 C. 114; Shabiuddin v. Debmoorat Koer 30 C. 655; Kallu v. Manni 23 A. 93 : A.W.N. (1900) 212; Jadunandan Prosad Singha v. Koer Kallyan Singh 13 Ind. Cas.
Fateh Chand And Anr. vs Narsingh Das And Anr. on 16 May, 1912
228 : 14 C.L.J. 159; Fateh Cand v. Narsingh Das 16 Ind. Cas. 988 : 22 C.L.J. 383. The plaintiff will, in addition, have a decree, against the District Board, for Rs. 957-11-1 together with interest thereon at 6 per cent. per annum from 4th December 1900 to the date of realisation. The plaintiff will have his costs in the Courts of the Subordinate Judge and the District Judge from the Distric. Board, and his costs in this Court from the other defendants. A self-contained decree, which will set out the various sums in detail, will be drawn up in this Court.