Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.32 seconds)
Prem Pal Varshney vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 1 November, 1989 cites

Ravindra Prakash Arya vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 24 April, 1984

5. Learned counsel for the opposite party on the other hand urged that as under Section 29 of the Code Magistrate could not pass a sentence for life imprisonment or imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years, hence the provisions of Section 36 of the Act were not applicable and in any case said provision was just an enabling provision and that too was in respect of special and exceptional cases. It was further urged that no prejudice was caused to the applicant hence the order of learned sessions Judge, directing the Chief Judicial Magistrate to commit the case to the court of session, does not require any interference. It was next urged that the decision in Ravindra Prakash Arya v. Union of India 1984 Cri LJ 1321 (All) (Supra) was applicable to the case.
Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Ranjit Chatterjee vs State Of West Bengal on 13 August, 1985

18. As regards the Division Bench decision of Calcutta High Court in Ranjit Chatterjee v. The State of West Bengal, (1985 Drugs Cases 121), the case was committed to the Court of Session by the Magistrate and the sentence was awarded and thereafter it was argued that the Magistrate has incorrectly committed the case to the Court of Session, consequently that case was on different facts. Apart from that legislative history of the provisions of Section 29 of present Code and Section 32 of the Old Code along with Section 36 of the Act was not taken into account.
Calcutta High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 Next