Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)

Kanwar Singh And Ors. Etc. Etc vs Union Of India on 30 October, 1998

As a matter of fact, the claimants should have of produced the award in question in evidence, may be by way of leading additional evidence and also producing rt other cogent and reliable evidence to show that the potentiality and utility of the land, subject matter of dispute in that award, was the same and similar to that of the potentiality and nature of the land in the case in hand. No such procedure, however, has been resorted to and as such, in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Kanwar Singh's case supra, learned Court below has erred in law while taking the award dated 27.2.2010 of village Bassal into consideration to re-determine the market value of the acquired land at the rate of Rs.55,000/- per Kanal. Had there been any evidence produced by the claimants that the potentiality of the acquired land in village Rainsary to which award Ext.P11 pertains is similar to ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 21:57:07 :::HCHP ...17...
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 258 - V N Khare - Full Document
1