Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (2.63 seconds)Section 398 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 10F in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 100A in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 399 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 483 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 402 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 10E in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Hanuman Prasad Bagri & Ors vs Bagress Cereals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors on 27 March, 2001
In the case of Hanuman Prasad Bagri & Ors. vs. Bagress Cereals
Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. reported in (2001) 4 SCC 420, their Lordships held
that in order to grant relief under section 397, the petitioner should
make out a case for winding up of the company on just and equitable
ground and in that case, their Lordships held that illegal termination
of the directorship of the petitioner was not such a ground to justify
winding up of the company.
Gandla Pannala Bhulaxmi vs Managing Director, Apsrtc And Anr. on 10 June, 2003
In the case of Gandla Pannala Bhulaxmi vs. Managing Director,
APSRTC & Anr. reported in AIR 2003 AP 458, the Full Bench of the
Andhra Pradesh High Court has taken a similar view in the matter.
Same is the view taken by the Full Bench of the Kerala High Court in
the case of Kesava Pillai Sreedharan Pillai and etc. vs. State of
Kerala & Ors. reported in AIR 2004 Kerala 111. Therefore, in this
view of the matter, we are of opinion that the preliminary objection
raised by Mr.Nariman cannot be sustained and the same is overruled.