Smt. Mayawanti vs Smt. Kaushalya Devi on 6 April, 1990
In Mayawanti v. Kaushalya Devi, , the Supreme Court held as follows:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.81 seconds)Mathila Sice And Anr. vs Fritz Gaebele And Ors. on 28 September, 1925
In Mathilda Sice v. Fritz Gaebele, AIR 1926 Mad. 955, it has been laid down that a mere account book without more does not prove anything and that it is for the party, who puts forward the accounts, to explain them and support them in such a way as to convince the Judge that there is such a probability of their occupancy as to make it reasonable for a prudent man to accept them. The law requires proof not only of account books generally but of each item that is in the interest of the person producing the books, but with regard to
admissions i.e., entries against the producer's own pecuniary interest, the law dispenses with all proof, save, that the book has been kept by or under the authority of the producer.
1