Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.28 seconds)Section 2 in The Public Premises (Eviction Of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 7 October, 1985
9. The facts of Express Newspapers case are totally
different from the facts of the present case.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 4 in The Public Premises (Eviction Of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
The Contempt Of Courts Act, 1971
Delhi Development Authority vs Shri Raj Kumar on 20 April, 1999
70. I have found above that the respondents are not prohibited on
grounds of res judicata or on any other ground from proceeding with the
process initiated by them under the Public Premises (Eviction of
Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. Unlike the facts in the judgment
reported at (1999) IV AD Delhi 214 DDA VS. Raj Kumar, the public
authorities have made out a strong case as to why the land is needed.
Even in this pronouncement, the court has held that the proceedings for
eviction under this statute are maintainable. According to DDA, the
petitioner stood notified of the requirement by the letter dated 2 nd
January, 1995 of the land.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 11 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Mahadeo Savlaram Shelke & Ors vs The Puna Municipal Corpn. & Anr on 23 January, 1995
68. My attention has also been drawn to para 14 of 1995 (3) SCC 33
Mahadeo Savlaram Shelke & Ors. Vs. Pune Municipal Corporation
& Anr., it is urged that the delay in the present matter is working undue
loss to public interest. The observations of the Apex Court so far as the
grant of injunction against public authority from execution of projects of
public utility deserves to be considered and reads as follows:-