Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.59 seconds)R.M. Subramaniam vs N. Sundaram Iyer on 13 September, 1962
In Subramaniam v. Sundaram , a Full Bench of our High Court had to consider the propriety of a Court taking note of subsequent events. It is no doubt true that a suit has to be decided on the facts and circumstances existing on the date of its institution, but circumstances do warrant a Court taking into consideration supervening events as well provided the justice of the case requires. In the above decision, the Full Bench observed:
Nichhalbhai Vallabhai And Ors. vs Jaswantlal Zinabhai And Ors. on 23 August, 1965
6. Lastly, I desire to refer to the case reported in Nichhalbhai v. Jaswantlal , where their Lordships of the Supreme Court make it very clear that,
...if the amendment is refused the plaintiff may have to bring another suit and the object of the rule for allowing amendments to the plaint is to avoid multiplicity of suits.
The Trade Marks Act, 1999
1