Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.32 seconds)Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
In the facts and circumstances of the case as mentioned herein above and in view of the ratio decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bhajan Lal(supra) that extraordinary powers should be exercised sparingly and that too in the rarest of rare cases, this Court while exercising its extraordinary powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., do not think that the instant cases are rarest of rare cases which require any interference by this Court and the impugned FIRs' cannot said to be false at its face value, as observed herein above.
Section 482 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 155 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Pratibha vs Rameshwari Devi & Ors on 17 September, 2007
45. Further the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pratibha Vs. Rameshwari Devi And Others (supra), while reiterating the principles laid down in the case of Bhajan Lal (supra), held that High Court is entitled to exercise its inherent jurisdiction for quashing a criminal proceeding/FIR when allegations made in the same do not disclose commission of an offence- Also, it depends upon facts and circumstances of each particular case.
State Of A.P vs Bajjoori Kanthaiah & Anr on 20 October, 2008
44. In the instant cases, the petitioners are utterly failed to make out their case as to how the FIRs' in question lodged against them are false at its face value. The impugned FIRs' cannot be quashed on the solitary ground that civil suit is pending between the parties and in such eventuality, criminal proceeding may not be allowed to continue, as the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Bajjoori Kanthaiah & Anr.(supra), has held that the complaint/F.I.R. has to be read as a whole. If it appears that on consideration of the allegations in the light of the statement made on oath of the complainant or disclosed in the F.I.R. that the ingredients of the offence or offences are disclosed and there is no material to show that the complaint/F.I.R. is mala fide, frivolous or vexatious, in that event there would be no justification for interference by the High Court.