Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.20 seconds)

Central Bank Of India vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 27 February, 2009

11. It is settled under law by judgments rendered by Madras High Court as well as Madhya Pradesh High Court that in cases where Non-Bailable Warrant and Under Section 82 of Cr.P.C., has been issued and steps for Non-Bailable Warrant and under Section 82 has not been taken, the case cannot be dismissed under Section 204 (4) of Code of Criminal Procedure. As the order of dismissal under Section 204 (4) cannot be treated to be 8 an acquittal as held by the Kerala High Court too in Central Bank of India vs. Kerala State, reported in 2016 (1) DCR 490.
Supreme Court of India Cites 174 - Cited by 252 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

Inder Mohan Goswami & Another vs State Of Uttaranchal & Others on 9 October, 2007

In that eventuality, certain guidelines have been framed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in a judgment reported in AIR 2008 SCC 251, Inder Mohan Goswami & another vs. State of Uttaranchal & others; that while issuing Non-Bailable Warrant, the Court should exercise an extreme caution but when at times it becomes imperative to ensure an appearance of an accused to meet the ends of justice, the curtailment of freedom for a certain period could only be done by issuance of Non-Bailable Warrants. Para 52 and 53 is quoted herein below:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 1931 - D Bhandari - Full Document
1   2 Next