Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.21 seconds)

S. Narayanappa & Ors vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bangalore on 27 September, 1966

28. It has been held in the case of Assistant Collector of Customs v. Malhotra, (paragraph 13) following its earlier decision in the case of Narayanappa v. Commissioner of Income Tax. Bangalore, reported in AIR 1967 SC 523 that the satisfaction as to the reasonable belief under Sub-section 1 of Section 110 of the Customs Act is not absolutely subjective in as much as the reason for the belief of the appropriate officer have to be relevant and not extraneous.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 392 - V Ramaswami - Full Document

Ranjit Export Private Ltd. vs Collector Of Customs, Madras on 6 September, 1984

39. There has to be an overt act on the part of the concerned person for constituting an attempt to export. The view which I am taking is supported by decision of the Madras and Bombay High Courts. It has been held by the Madras High Court in the case of Ranjit Export (P) Ltd v. Collector of Customs, Madras, that without there being any overt act towards movement of the goods for taking them out of India there cannot be attempt to export. Same is the view taken by Collector, Central Excise and Gold Control (CEGAT) (CEGAT) and (CEGAT) where it has been held, inter alia, that without actual movement of the goods there is no attempt to export and when the goods were kept in a private godown for six months without any movement of the same towards Nepal, there was no attempt to export.
Madras High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1   2 Next