Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.21 seconds)
Dusyanta Sarma Das vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 8 March, 2022 cites

Board Of High School & Intermediate ... vs Kumari Chittra Srivastava & Others on 20 November, 1969

In Board of High School v. Chitra Srivastava13, the Board cancelled the examination of the petitioner who had actually appeared at the examination on the ground that there was shortage in attendance at lectures. Admittedly, no notice was given to her before taking the action. On behalf of the Board it was contended that the facts were not in dispute and therefore, `no useful purpose would have been served' by giving a show cause notice to the petitioner. This Court, however, set aside the decision of the Board, holding that the Board was acting in a quasi-judicial capacity and, therefore, it ought to have observed the principles of natural justice.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 92 - K S Hegde - Full Document

Jankinath Sarangi vs State Of Orissa on 11 March, 1969

In Jankinath Sarangi v. State of Orissa 16, it was contended that natural justice was violated inasmuch as the petitioner was not allowed to lead evidence and the material gathered behind his back was used in determining his guilt. Dealing with the contention, the Court stated: (SCC p. 394, para 5) "5......We have to look to what actual prejudice has been caused to a person by the supposed denial to him of a particular right".
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 75 - Full Document

Smt.Shashi Agrawal vs Sbi Life Insu.Co. on 19 December, 2019

42. Recently, in P.D. Agrawal v. SBI23 this Court restated the principles of natural justice and indicated that they are flexible and in the recent times, they had undergone a `sea change'. If there is no prejudice to the employee, an action cannot be set aside merely on the ground that no hearing was afforded before taking a decision by the authority."
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 20 - Full Document
1