Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.11 seconds)Section 417 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
R. P. Kapur vs The State Of Punjab on 25 March, 1960
8. On perusal of the impugned charge sheet and the material in
support of the same, this Court does not find it to be a case which
can be determined or gone into in an application under Section 482
Cr.P.C. This Court cannot hold a parallel trial in an application under
Section 482 Cr.P.C. No such ground appears to be available to the
petitioner on the basis of which the impugned charge sheet can be
quashed going by the settled law in R.P.Kapur v. State of Punjab1;
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal2; State of Bihar v. P.P.Sharma3
and Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Limited v. Mohd. Saraful
Haque and another4. Hence, the prayer for quashing the
proceedings in P.R.C.No.49 of 2021 on the file of the X Additional
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, is refused.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
8. On perusal of the impugned charge sheet and the material in
support of the same, this Court does not find it to be a case which
can be determined or gone into in an application under Section 482
Cr.P.C. This Court cannot hold a parallel trial in an application under
Section 482 Cr.P.C. No such ground appears to be available to the
petitioner on the basis of which the impugned charge sheet can be
quashed going by the settled law in R.P.Kapur v. State of Punjab1;
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal2; State of Bihar v. P.P.Sharma3
and Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Limited v. Mohd. Saraful
Haque and another4. Hence, the prayer for quashing the
proceedings in P.R.C.No.49 of 2021 on the file of the X Additional
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, is refused.
State Of Bihar Etc. Etc vs P.P. Sharma, Ias And Anr on 2 April, 1991
8. On perusal of the impugned charge sheet and the material in
support of the same, this Court does not find it to be a case which
can be determined or gone into in an application under Section 482
Cr.P.C. This Court cannot hold a parallel trial in an application under
Section 482 Cr.P.C. No such ground appears to be available to the
petitioner on the basis of which the impugned charge sheet can be
quashed going by the settled law in R.P.Kapur v. State of Punjab1;
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal2; State of Bihar v. P.P.Sharma3
and Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Limited v. Mohd. Saraful
Haque and another4. Hence, the prayer for quashing the
proceedings in P.R.C.No.49 of 2021 on the file of the X Additional
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, is refused.
M/S Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd.& ... vs Md Sharaful Haque & Anr on 1 November, 2004
8. On perusal of the impugned charge sheet and the material in
support of the same, this Court does not find it to be a case which
can be determined or gone into in an application under Section 482
Cr.P.C. This Court cannot hold a parallel trial in an application under
Section 482 Cr.P.C. No such ground appears to be available to the
petitioner on the basis of which the impugned charge sheet can be
quashed going by the settled law in R.P.Kapur v. State of Punjab1;
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal2; State of Bihar v. P.P.Sharma3
and Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Limited v. Mohd. Saraful
Haque and another4. Hence, the prayer for quashing the
proceedings in P.R.C.No.49 of 2021 on the file of the X Additional
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, is refused.
1