Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.29 seconds)
New vs Shantaben on 26 February, 2010 cites

M/S. National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Baljit Kaur And Ors on 6 January, 2004

In view of above discussion made by apex court, contention raised by learned Advocate Mr. Nanavati cannot be accepted. According to my opinion, claims tribunal has rightly decided matter relying upon decision of apex court in case of Satpal Singh reported in AIR 2000 SC 235, claims tribunal has not committed any error when law has been decided by apex court in Baljit Kaur (supra), where legal position made clear, therefore, according to my opinion, claims tribunal has not committed any error which would require interference of this Court According to my opinion, claims tribunal has rightly relied upon decision which was binding and holding field at the relevant time to claims tribunal as precedent under Article 141 of Constitution of India. Therefore, none of contentions raised by learned Advocoate Mr. Nanavati can be accepted by this court and same are therefore rejected. Except that, on quantum, no contention has been raised by learned Advocate Mr. Nanavati before this court. Therefore, this court has not examined that part. Accordingly, for reasons recorded above, there is no substance in these appeals and same are required to be dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 713 - V N Khare - Full Document

Bhavnagar University vs Palitana Sugar Mill Pvt. Ltd. & Ors on 3 December, 2002

In a decision Bhavnagar University v. Palitana Sugar Mill (P) Ltd. (2003(2) SCC 111) the view in the said case was reiterated by observing that statements of fact as to what transpired at the hearing, recorded in the judgment of the court are conclusive of the facts so stated and no one can contradict such statements by affidavit or other evidence. if a party thinks that the happenings in court have been wrongly recorded in a judgment, it is incumbent upon the party while the mater is still fresh in the minds of the Judges to call the attention of the very judges who have made the record. That is the only way to have the record corrected. If no such step is taken, the mater must necessarily end there.
Supreme Court of India Cites 59 - Cited by 919 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 Next