Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.22 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 306 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Arulvelu & Anr vs State Rep By Public Prosecutor & Anr on 7 October, 2009
However, when two views are
possible, the view favouring the accused should be preferred vide
judgment of the Supreme Court in Arulvelu and Another v. State
represented by the Public Prosecutor and Another [(2009) 10 SCC
http://www.judis.nic.in
17
206], wherein the Supreme Court has held as follows:
State Of W.B vs Orilal Jaiswal on 23 September, 1993
In State of West Bengal v. Orilal Jaiswal (supra), the Trial
Court convicted the accused and the Appellate Court reversed the
conviction, the reason for which was found to be very frail by the
Supreme Court, which reversed the acquittal and restored the Trial Court
order.
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Through Inspector Of Police, A.P vs K. Narasimhachary on 7 October, 2005
In State v. K.
Narasimhachary [State v. K. Narasimhachary, (2005) 8
SCC 364 : (2006) 1 SCC (Cri) 41] , this Court reiterated
the well-settled principle that if two views are possible,
the appellate court should not interfere with the acquittal
by the lower court and that only where the material on
record leads to an inescapable conclusion of guilt of the
accused, the judgment of acquittal will call for
interference by the appellate court.