Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 64 (0.33 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 141 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Government of India Act, 1935
Section 2 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
Sushilabai Laxminarayan Mudliyar And ... vs Nihalchand Waghajibhai Shah And Others on 30 July, 1991
In Kishorilal (supra), the Apex Court had expressly stated that an LPA would be maintainable if the writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, as has been held by the Apex Court in Shushilabai Laxminarayan Mudaliyar and Ors. (supra).
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Rama And Company vs State Of M.P. And Anr. on 3 April, 2007
85. (17) In the case of Rama and Co. (supra), the Apex Court has dismissed the SLP by a speaking order though giving short reasoning, hence, it will be covered in category No. (v) mentioned by the Apex Court in the aforesaid decision, i.e., if the order refusing leave to appeal is a speaking order, i.e., giving reasons for refusing the grant of leave. In such circumstances, there are only two implications, firstly, the statement of law contained in the order is a declaration of law by the Supreme Court within the meaning of Article 141 of the Constitution of India and, secondly other than the declaration of law, whatever is stated in the order are the findings recorded by the Supreme Court which would bind the parties thereto and also the Court, Tribunal or Authority in any proceeding subsequent thereto by way of judicial discipline, the Supreme Court being the Apex Court of the country.
State Of M.P. And Ors. vs M.S. Wakankar And Anr. on 2 November, 2006
The view taken by the Division Bench in Rama and Company (supra), was referred to a Larger Bench as there was a conflict of opinion amongst the decisions in the cases of Rama and Company (supra), State of Madhya Pradesh v. M.S. Wakankar 2007(1) M.P.H.T. 298 (DB) : 2007(1) M PLJ 99 and Shrimad Shiva Dubey (Jhira) v. Sumit Ranjan Dubey W.A. No. 310/2006, decided on 14-8-2006.
M/S. Lokmat Newspapers Pvt. Ltd vs Shankarprasad on 19 July, 1999
6. Hence, we are of the view that it is wholly unnecessary for us to examine this aspect of the matter in view of the declaration of law may by this Court in Lokmat Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. v. Shankarprasad , (supra), after adverting to all the decisions on the point.