Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.16 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Chander Shekhar @ Shekhar vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 20 July, 2011
15. Moreover, no DD entry in respect of PW1(a) and PW3 is
proved on record to establish that they were actually present in the area at
the relevant time in connection with patrolling of the area. PW1(a) and
PW3 both in their testimony have deposed that on the day of incident, they
were on patrolling duty vide DD entry no. 35B but neither the said DD has
been placed on record nor the same has been proved. Thus the presence
of these witnesses at the alleged time itself is rendered doubtful. This view
FIR NO. 626/2008 PAGE 7 OF PAGE 8
PS MALVIYA NAGAR
has been expressed by the Delhi High Court in Shekhar v. State of NCT
of Delhi, (Delhi) (D.B.) 2008 Cri.L.J. 3258.
Section 25 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
1