Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)Section 52A in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Khet Singh vs Union Of India on 20 March, 2002
11. Secondly, when the very same Standing Orders came
up for considerations in Khet Singh v. Union of India,
(2002) 4 SCC 380 this Court took the vie that they are
merely intended to guide the officers to see that a fair
procedure is adopted by the Officer-in-Charge of the
investigation. It was also held that they were not
inexorable rules as there could be circumstances in which
it may not be possible for the seizing officer to prepare
the mahazar at the spot, if it is a chance recovery, where
the officer may not have the facility to prepare the
::: Downloaded on - 28/09/2019 23:59:00 :::HCHP
14
seizure mahazar at the spot itself. Hence, we do not find
any substance in this contention."
Section 18 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
State Of Punjab vs Makhan Chand on 27 February, 2004
15. Subsequently, the issue came up before the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in State of Punjab versus Makhan Chand,
(2004) 3 SCC 453, wherein it was observed as under:-
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
The Payment And Settlement Systems Act, 2007
1