Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.39 seconds)Sanjay Chandra vs Cbi on 23 November, 2011
"This Court in Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation (2012) 1 SCC 40, also involving an
economic offence of formidable magnitude, while
dealing with the issue of grant of bail, had observed
that deprivation of liberty must be considered a
punishment unless it is required to ensure that an
accused person would stand his trial when called upon
and that the courts owe more than verbal respect to the
principle that punishment begins after conviction and
that every man is deemed to be innocent until duly
tried and found guilty. It was underlined that the object
::: Downloaded on - 11/02/2019 22:00:35 :::HCHP
12
of bail is neither punitive nor preventive. This Court
sounded a caveat that any imprisonment before
conviction has a substantial punitive content and it
.
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 436 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 439 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Dataram Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 6 February, 2018
11. Recently, the Hon'ble Apex Court in Criminal Appeal
No. 227/2018, Dataram Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr
decided on 6.2.2018 has held that freedom of an individual can
not be curtailed for indefinite period, especially when his/her
guilt is yet to be proved. It has further held by the Hon'ble Apex
Court in the aforesaid judgment that a person is believed to be
innocent until found guilty. The Hon'ble Apex Court has held as
under:
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012
Manoranjana Sinh @ Gupta vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 6 February, 2017
In Manoranjana Sinh alias Gupta versus CBI,
(2017) 5 SCC 218, Hon'ble Apex Court has held as under: