Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)Bihari Lal And Ors. vs Union Of India, Etc. on 1 August, 1978
2. For convenience facts are taken from the case of Munni Lal &
Others vs. U.O.I. Etc.
Ram Bhawan Upadhyay vs Uoi & Ors. on 6 February, 2019
Learned counsel for
the applicants submitted that applicants have already given up their
right to challenge closure of Military Farms, which will be taken care
of by the Union people before appropriate Government by raising
industrial dispute, therefore, their claim for closure of farms may be
treated as not pressed with liberty and only prayer for regularization
19
be considered against available sanctioned vacancies as directed by
this Tribunal in the case of Ram Bhawan (supra).
Pawan Kumar Verma And Ors. Etc Etc vs State Of Haryana And Anr Etc Etc on 23 November, 2015
Based upon above noted judgments, a
plea has been raised by learned counsel for the applicants that since
a direction has been given in the case of Pawan Kumar (supra)
further followed in the case of Harvinder Yadav (supra), then let the
cases of the applicants herein be also considered on the same lines.
They have also admitted that all the candidates cannot be adjusted
because they are large in number and there are only 64 vacancies,
therefore, their cases be considered in terms of their respective
seniority by a Committee to be constituted by the department and
they be directed not to raise plea of over-age and experience and
that of not working against sanctioned posts.
Harinder Kaur vs New India Assurance Company Ltd. And ... on 24 February, 2016
8. There is another decision in the case of Harinder Yadav vs. UOI
Etc. O.A. No.60/568/2015 decided on 26.11.2017, whereby the OA
was disposed of by directing the respondents to consider claim of
the applicant therein in accordance with law. That decision was also
challenged by UOI in CWP No.5569/2018 which was dismissed as
withdrawn on 17.04.2018.
1