Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.31 seconds)The Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005
Section 4 in The Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
State Of Punjab & Ors vs Nokia India Pvt Ltd on 17 December, 2014
the application of Rule 3(b) and the test of essential
character was not argued in the Nokia India Case and
there is no finding on the said aspect.
Section 45 in The Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
The Income Tax Act, 1961
M/S Delhi Airtech Services Pvt. ... vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 18 August, 2011
Ltd. Vs. State of UP9 (hereinafter referred to as the
Samsung India Case) also has no relevance.
H. H. Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao Jiwaji ... vs Union Of India on 15 December, 1970
In Madhav Rao Jiwaji Rao Scindia Bahadur and
Ors. Vs. Union of India16, the Apex Court has observed that:
All Kerala Ex-Ser.Secuty.Staff ... vs Union Of India on 30 August, 2017
In BSNL v. Union of India17, relied upon by the
assessees, it has held that: