Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.98 seconds)
M/S.The Indian Hume Pipe Co vs . on 28 January, 2025 cites

State Of Bihar And Others vs Jain Plastics And Chemicals Limited on 21 November, 2001

“7. ...Where a complicated question of fact is involved and the matter requires thorough proof on factual aspects, the High Court should not entertain the writ petition.. .As noted above, the writ petition was primarily founded on allegation of breach of contract. Question whether the action of the opposite party in the writ petition amounted to 17/34 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.12557 of 2017 breach of contractual obligation ultimately depends on facts and would require material evidence to be scrutinised and in such a case writ jurisdiction should not be exercised. (See State of Bihar v. Jain Plastics & Chemicals Ltd. [(2002) 1 SCC 216] )
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 211 - Full Document

State Bank Of India & Ors vs State Bank Of India Canteen Employees' ... on 5 May, 1998

8. In a catena of cases this Court has held that where the dispute revolves round questions of fact, the matter ought not to be entertained under Article 226 of the Constitution. [See State Bank of India v. State Bank of India Canteen Employees' Union [(1998) 5 SCC 74 : 1998 SCC (L&S) 1270] and Chairman, Grid Corpn. of Orissa Ltd. (GRIDCO) v. Sukamani Das [(1999) 7 SCC 298] .] ...
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Chairman Grid Corporation Of Orissa ... vs Smt. Sukamani Das And Anr. Etc on 15 September, 1999

8. In a catena of cases this Court has held that where the dispute revolves round questions of fact, the matter ought not to be entertained under Article 226 of the Constitution. [See State Bank of India v. State Bank of India Canteen Employees' Union [(1998) 5 SCC 74 : 1998 SCC (L&S) 1270] and Chairman, Grid Corpn. of Orissa Ltd. (GRIDCO) v. Sukamani Das [(1999) 7 SCC 298] .] ...
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 182 - Full Document

National Highway Authority Of India vs Ganga Enterprises And Anr on 28 August, 2003

In National Highways Authority of India v. Ganga Enterprises [(2003) 7 SCC 410] it was observed by this Court that the question whether the writ petition was maintainable in a claim arising out of a breach of contract should be answered first by the High Court as it would go to the root of the matter. The writ petitioner had displayed ingenuity in its search for invalidating circumstances; but a writ petition is not an appropriate remedy for impeaching contractual obligations.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 237 - Full Document

Radhakrishna Agarwal & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 17 March, 1977

In Radhakrishna Agarwal v. State of Bihar [(1977) 3 SCC 457 : AIR 1977 SC 1496] the types of cases in which breaches of alleged obligation by the State or its agents can be set up were enumerated. The third category, indicated is where the contract entered into between the State and the person aggrieved is non-statutory and purely contractual and the rights and liabilities of the parties are governed by the terms of the contract and in exercise of executive power of the State. The present case is covered by the said category. No writ order can be issued under Article 226 to compel the authorities to remedy a breach of contract; pure and simple. It is more so when factual disputes are involved. 18/34 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.12557 of 2017 B. Internal dispute mechanism – to be exhausted:
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 684 - M H Beg - Full Document
1   2 Next