Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.20 seconds)
Sandeep Gupta vs Uoi & Others Through on 23 September, 2015 cites

Rajbir Singh Dalal vs Chaudhari Devi Lal University & Anr on 6 August, 2008

In support of the submission, reliance was placed on B.C. Mylarappa v. Dr. R.Venkatasubbaiah, (2008) 14 SCC 306, and Rajbir Singh Dalal (Dr.) v. Chaudhari Devi Lal University, (2008) 9 SCC 284. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for respondent-Shivanand contended that a person holding the post-graduate degree in Mathematics is not eligible for appointment as Lecturer in MCA. The Board of appointment misdirected itself in going into the question as to whether Mathematics is a relevant subject or not in MCA. The opinion of the Board of appointment, as approved by the Syndicate, is not that sacrosanct so as to deprive the Honble High Court of the power of judicial review. Dismissing the appeals, the Honble Supreme Court held thus:
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 252 - M Katju - Full Document

B.C.Mylarappa @ Chikkamylarappa vs R.Venkatsubbaiah & Ors on 3 October, 2008

In support of the submission, reliance was placed on B.C. Mylarappa v. Dr. R.Venkatasubbaiah, (2008) 14 SCC 306, and Rajbir Singh Dalal (Dr.) v. Chaudhari Devi Lal University, (2008) 9 SCC 284. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for respondent-Shivanand contended that a person holding the post-graduate degree in Mathematics is not eligible for appointment as Lecturer in MCA. The Board of appointment misdirected itself in going into the question as to whether Mathematics is a relevant subject or not in MCA. The opinion of the Board of appointment, as approved by the Syndicate, is not that sacrosanct so as to deprive the Honble High Court of the power of judicial review. Dismissing the appeals, the Honble Supreme Court held thus:
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 75 - T Chatterjee - Full Document

Ganpath Singh Gangaram Singh Rajput vs Gulbarga Univ.Tr.Regr.& Ors on 1 November, 2013

D) Diploma in Electronics and Communication Engineering in lieu of Diploma in Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering will be treated as fulfillment of EQ. 11.3 The question that arises for consideration in this case is as to whether the applicants, who possess the Degree in B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics, can be said to have possessed Bachelors Degree in Science with Physics as one of the main subjects, which has been prescribed as the minimum essential educational qualification for selection and appointment to the post of Scientific Assistant in Indian Meteorological Department. Although we have found from the syllabuses of B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics, and B.Sc.(Honours) Physics, that the applicants have studied some of the course contents of B.Sc.(Honours) Physics in the three-year course of B.Sc. (Honours)Electronics, yet it cannot be said that they have studied Physics as a main subject in B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics inasmuch as they have studied Electronics as main subject and some papers of the subject of Physics in B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics. Therefore, in our considered view, the applicants having not studied Physics as a main subject in B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics, cannot be held to be eligible for appointment to the post of Scientific Assistant in terms of the recruitment notice and the clarificatory note (ibid). When the Bachelors Degree in Science with Physics as one of the main subjects has been clearly prescribed as the minimum essential educational qualification, and when the applicants are found to have studied Electronics as main subject and some of the papers of Physics in three-year course of B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics, they cannot be said to have fulfilled the minimum essential educational qualification prescribed for the post of Scientific Assistant. Thus, having failed to fulfill the essential educational qualification, the applicants are ineligible for the post of Scientific Assistant. This view of ours is fortified by the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in Ganpath Singh Gangaram Singh Rajput v. Gulbarga University, represented by its Registrar & others, (2014) 3 SCC 767.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 96 - C K Prasad - Full Document

Khushbu Sharma vs Uoi & Ors on 23 May, 2013

6. Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing for the applicants, invited our attention to the syllabus of B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics prescribed by the University of Delhi, and the certificates issued by the Principal of the college where the applicants studied B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics, and submitted that the applicants have studied Mechanics & Strength of materials, Electricity and Magnetism, Thermal Physics, Mathematical Physics I, Mathematical Physics II and have conducted Physics Practical-I in the first year, and have studied Modern Physics and Quantum Mechanics, Modern Optics and Opto-electronics, Mathematical Physics III, and have conducted Physics Practical-II in the second year, and have studied Electromagnetism and Antennas in the third year of the three-year course of B.Sc.(Honours) Electronics. Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj also invited our attention to the prospectus wherein it has been laid down that B.Sc.( Honours) Electronics is also prescribed as the minimum eligibility requirement for admission to M.Sc. (Physics). Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj also invited our attention to the courses of study for B.Sc. (Honours) Physics, and contended that the applicants have studied most of the course contents B.Sc. (Honours) Physics. It was, therefore, contended by Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj that the applicants, having studied Physics as one of the main subjects in B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics, could not have been held as not possessing Bachelors Degree in Science with Physics as one of the main subjects. To buttress his contentions, Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj placed reliance on the decisions of the Honble High Court of Delhi in Ms.Nisha, etc. v. Union of India and others, etc., W.P.( C ) No. 6100 of 2012 & connected writ petitions, decided on 26.11.2012; Khushbu Sharma v. UOI & others, W.P. ( C ) No.2916 of 2013, decided on 23.5.2013; and Ravinder Chauhan v. UOI & others, W.P. ( C ) No.3663 of 2011, decided on 23.7.2014.
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 2 - G Mittal - Full Document

Ravinder Chauhan vs Uoi And Ors. on 23 July, 2014

6. Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing for the applicants, invited our attention to the syllabus of B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics prescribed by the University of Delhi, and the certificates issued by the Principal of the college where the applicants studied B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics, and submitted that the applicants have studied Mechanics & Strength of materials, Electricity and Magnetism, Thermal Physics, Mathematical Physics I, Mathematical Physics II and have conducted Physics Practical-I in the first year, and have studied Modern Physics and Quantum Mechanics, Modern Optics and Opto-electronics, Mathematical Physics III, and have conducted Physics Practical-II in the second year, and have studied Electromagnetism and Antennas in the third year of the three-year course of B.Sc.(Honours) Electronics. Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj also invited our attention to the prospectus wherein it has been laid down that B.Sc.( Honours) Electronics is also prescribed as the minimum eligibility requirement for admission to M.Sc. (Physics). Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj also invited our attention to the courses of study for B.Sc. (Honours) Physics, and contended that the applicants have studied most of the course contents B.Sc. (Honours) Physics. It was, therefore, contended by Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj that the applicants, having studied Physics as one of the main subjects in B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics, could not have been held as not possessing Bachelors Degree in Science with Physics as one of the main subjects. To buttress his contentions, Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj placed reliance on the decisions of the Honble High Court of Delhi in Ms.Nisha, etc. v. Union of India and others, etc., W.P.( C ) No. 6100 of 2012 & connected writ petitions, decided on 26.11.2012; Khushbu Sharma v. UOI & others, W.P. ( C ) No.2916 of 2013, decided on 23.5.2013; and Ravinder Chauhan v. UOI & others, W.P. ( C ) No.3663 of 2011, decided on 23.7.2014.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - S R Bhat - Full Document
1