Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.27 seconds)Section 32M in The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Coinage Act, 1906
Section 85 in The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 85A in The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 32G in The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Gundaji Satwaji Shinde vs Ramchandra Bhikaji Joshi on 5 December, 1978
15. To buttress his arguments, learned counsel for the appellants relied
upon the judgment in Bhimaji Shankar Kulkarni v. D.V. Udapudi &
Anr.1 and Gundaji Satwaji Shinde v. R.B. Joshi2. The two judgments
considered the scheme of the said Act, to opine that where there were
uncertainties on the issue as to whether a tenant is or is not a protected
tenant, the civil court must stay its hand and refer the issue to the
Mamlatdar and once such determination takes place (which is final as per
Section 85A of the said Act) then the suit can proceed further.
Section 70 in The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948
Bhimaji Shanker Kulkarni vs Dundappa Vithappa Udapudi And Anr on 5 May, 1965
15. To buttress his arguments, learned counsel for the appellants relied
upon the judgment in Bhimaji Shankar Kulkarni v. D.V. Udapudi &
Anr.1 and Gundaji Satwaji Shinde v. R.B. Joshi2. The two judgments
considered the scheme of the said Act, to opine that where there were
uncertainties on the issue as to whether a tenant is or is not a protected
tenant, the civil court must stay its hand and refer the issue to the
Mamlatdar and once such determination takes place (which is final as per
Section 85A of the said Act) then the suit can proceed further.