Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)The District Collector vs Fr. Jose Uppani on 21 July, 2020
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,
order or direction, commanding 2nd Respondent to add the
classification of land of 32.42 Ares comprised in Survey No: 536/1-
3,536/1-4,536/2,536/1-5,536/2-2-2 respectively of Poonithura Village
as "Dry land/ Purayidam" in "Basic Tax Register" and all revenue
records forth with
iii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ
order of direction, commanding 2nd respondents to reconsider Ext
P7 application in the light of the decision in District Collector,
Ernakulam & Others V. Fr. Jose Uppani & Others (2020(4) KHC 394
(DB)
iv. Issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction as
this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the
case. And
v. dispense with the filing of translation of vernacular
documents " [sic]
Anu Mathew vs The Revenue Divisional Officer on 28 January, 2022
In such circumstances, in the light of the principles
laid down by this Court in the above - said decisions, the
respondents are bound to remove the property of the petitioner
from the Data Bank, as the same is entered therein with a
description as converted land. As mentioned above, it is only an
erroneous entry, and the same has to be removed. However,
WP(C) NO. 28656 OF 2024 7
2025:KER:80827
since the petitioner has already submitted Ext.P4 application in
Form 5, even though the same was not necessary, I am of the
view that, for issuing necessary orders in this regard for
removing the property from the Data Bank, the 2 nd respondent
can act upon Ext.P4."
1