Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.58 seconds)Md. Saifur Rahman vs State Of Assam And Ors. on 21 April, 1983
This Civil appeal has been preferred by the Jaipur Development Authority
against the Judgment of the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur in S.B. Civil
First Appeal No. 19 of 1995 dated 10.12.1996. By that Judg-ment, the High
Court rejected an application filed by the appellant for leading
"additional evidence" under Order 41 Rule 27, Code of Civil Procedure, in a
pending first appeal on the ground that the appellant had not led any
evidence in the trial court. The Court took the above view following a
decision of the Gauhati High Court in Md. Saifur Rahman v. State of Assam &
Others, AIR (1985) Gauhati 107 to the effect that the word additional in
Order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C meant the "joining or uniting one thing to another
so as to form one aggregate" and that a party was disentitled to produce
any additional evidence if he had not produced any evidence in the trial
Court.
1