Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (1.30 seconds)
Prashant Bohra And Anr. vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 31 October, 2003 cites

Maharashtra State Road ... vs Shri Balwant Regular Motor ... on 22 August, 1968

In Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Balwant Regular Motor Service, Amaravati and Ors. (8), the Hon'ble Supreme Court summarised the law of acquiescence observing that once an order is passed and accepted by the party, it derives benefit and advantage from it for some time, it would amount to acquiescence and such a party cannot be permitted to assail the validity of the order.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 398 - V Ramaswami - Full Document

Orissa University Of Agriculture & ... vs Manoj K. Mohanty on 17 April, 2003

In Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology and Anr. v. Manoj K. Mohanti (9), the Hon'ble Apex Court held that in absence of necessary averments and materials placed on record, there was no scope to give direction by the Court because the burden was on the employees to establish that they have a right to equal pay on the principle of "equal pay for equal work" relying on Article 14 of the Constitution of India and that having not been done, they are not entitled to the direction to get regular pay scale, the Apex Court further held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 118 - S V Patil - Full Document
1