Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.19 seconds)Section 342 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The State Of Punjab vs Gurmit Singh & Ors on 16 January, 1996
In State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh & Ors., (1996) 2 SCC
384, the Supreme Court laid down that normally no self respecting
woman would come forward to make false allegation of rape. Relevant
portion of the report is extracted hereunder:
Section 173 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Satyapal vs State Of Haryana on 8 April, 2009
16. In several cases, the Supreme Court noticed the delay in lodging FIR in
rape cases and took a view that delay in lodging FIR in such cases is a
normal phenomena. A reference may be fruitfully made to Satyapal v.
State of Haryana, AIR 2009 SC 2190, wherein the Supreme Court echoed
similar sentiments. Para 20 of the report is extracted hereunder:
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
State Of Rajasthan vs N. K. Accused on 30 March, 2000
In State of Rajasthan v. N.K.,
(2000) 5 SCC 30, the Supreme Court held as under:
Balwant Singh And Ors. vs State Of Punjab on 10 February, 1987
In Balwant Singh [Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab,
(1987) 2 SCC 27 : 1987 SCC (Cri) 249 : 1987 Cri LJ 971] this
Court held that every resistance need not necessarily be
accompanied by some injury on the body of the victim; the
prosecutrix being a girl of 19/20 years of age was not in the
facts and circumstances of the case expected to offer such
resistance as would cause injuries to her body.