Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 39 (0.28 seconds)
Vikram Singh vs Comm. Of Police on 7 March, 2023 cites

Devender Kumar Yadav vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 31 May, 2011

10.1 In view of the above analysis , we deem it appropriate to allow the present OA thereby quashing and setting aside the Impugned Order dated 6.7.2016 (Annexure -A/2) thereby restoring the selection of candidature of the applicant to the Constable (Executive) in Delhi Police with directions to the respondents to refer the case of the applicant to the Screening Committee of respondents in light Standing Order No.371/2011 23 O.A. No. 2497/2016 as well as Standing Order No.398/2010 and consider case of applicant for appointment, if otherwise found suitable. Needless to say that the Screening Committee shall consider the case of applicant in a judicious manner for appointment keeping the view the law laid by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Devender Kumar Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi in WP(C)No. 8731/2011 decided on 30th March, 2012 and several other similar matters followed by Commissioner of Police And Anr. vs Ramanuj Upadhyay on 9 July, 2012, in W.P.(C) 3926/2012, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and also Dhaval Singh case ( Supra). 10.2 The Screening Committee shall pass appropriate order(s) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this Order. It is made clear that the applicant shall not be entitled to any consequential benefits including seniority and /or any notional benefit in the peculiar facts of the case.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 13 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Police And Anr vs Ramanuj Upadhyay on 9 July, 2012

10.1 In view of the above analysis , we deem it appropriate to allow the present OA thereby quashing and setting aside the Impugned Order dated 6.7.2016 (Annexure -A/2) thereby restoring the selection of candidature of the applicant to the Constable (Executive) in Delhi Police with directions to the respondents to refer the case of the applicant to the Screening Committee of respondents in light Standing Order No.371/2011 23 O.A. No. 2497/2016 as well as Standing Order No.398/2010 and consider case of applicant for appointment, if otherwise found suitable. Needless to say that the Screening Committee shall consider the case of applicant in a judicious manner for appointment keeping the view the law laid by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Devender Kumar Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi in WP(C)No. 8731/2011 decided on 30th March, 2012 and several other similar matters followed by Commissioner of Police And Anr. vs Ramanuj Upadhyay on 9 July, 2012, in W.P.(C) 3926/2012, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and also Dhaval Singh case ( Supra). 10.2 The Screening Committee shall pass appropriate order(s) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this Order. It is made clear that the applicant shall not be entitled to any consequential benefits including seniority and /or any notional benefit in the peculiar facts of the case.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 10 - B D Ahmed - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next