Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.20 seconds)
Davender Kumar vs Chairman And Managing Director M/S ... on 13 November, 2013 cites

Gujarat State Dy. Executive Engineers' ... vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 May, 1994

In this regard we may also notice a recent decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Gujarat State Deputy Executive Engineers' Association Vs. The State of Gujarat & Ors. (1995)ILLJ1047SC . The Apex Court has held that a candidate from the waiting list has no right to claim appointment to any future vacancy which may arise unless the selection was held for it. The effect of making appointments of candidates from the waiting list on candidates who become eligible for competing for vacancies available in future, was expressed by Supreme Court in the following words -
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 220 - R M Sahai - Full Document

State Of Kerala vs M/S.Lakshmi Vilas Boarding And ... on 8 January, 2008

39. It is also to be borne in mind that there must be a judicially enforceable right for the enforcement of which a mandamus lies. The Supreme Court in State of Kerala Vs. A. Lakshmi katty and others, [1987]1SCR136 has held that a person whose name has been recommended for appointment as a District Judge by the High Count under Article 233(1) has no legal right to the post nor was the Governor bound to act on the advise of the High Court and, therefore ,he could not ask for mandamus. The existence of a right is the foundation of the jurisdiction of a court to issue a writ of mandamus. In this view too the law the petitioners have no right to ask for mandamus for their appointment as ADJ."
Kerala High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 6 - K Joseph - Full Document
1