Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.88 seconds)Atma Ram vs Shakuntala Rani on 30 August, 2005
As regards the observations of the Ld. ARC that the facts in
the instant case were distinct from the facts before the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in this case Atma Ram Vs. Shakuntala Rani, 123
(2005) Delhi Law Times 127 (SC), it is essential to observe that the
facts in the instant case as observed by the then Ld. ARCT vide order
dated 28.04.2006 in RCA No. 18/2006 apparently indicate that the
facts of the instant case are not distinguishable qua the ratio in Atma
Ram Vs. Shakuntala Rani, yet in view of the verdict of the Hon'ble
High Court of Delhi vide judgment dated 08.10.2009 in RCR No.
79/2006 which was a petition filed by the tenant, liberty to file a
petition with respect to the deposit made vide the application under
Section 27 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 in the Court of the
Additional Rent Controller where the petition under Section 14(1)(b)
was pending, was granted and thus the deposit of the rent in the Court
of the Additional Rent Controller where the petition under Section
14(1)(b) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 was pending would have
to be held to have been implicitly condoned.
1