Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 53 (0.39 seconds)Section 16 in The Industries (Development And Regulation) Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
The Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952
Section 5 in The Payment Of Bonus Act, 1965 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Industries (Development And Regulation) Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
The Payment Of Bonus Act, 1965
Section 5 in The Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 [Entire Act]
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, ... vs K.R. Subbaier Tape Factory, ... on 20 January, 1966
So far as the reasoning is concerned, it, therefore, suffers from the same fallacies from which the decision of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court in Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Madras v. K. R. Subbaier Tape Factory, Woriyur (supra) suffers.
Kapur Bhimber Union vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ... on 30 September, 1964
In Kapur Bhimber Union v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Punjab and another, [1966-II L.L.J. 870], a Division Bench of the Punjab High Court has followed the decision of that High Court in Haji Nadir Ali Khan's case (supra) and laid down the principle which we are laying down.
Mahaveer Metal Manufacturing Company vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ... on 23 January, 1969
In Mahaveer Metal Manufacturing Company, Falna v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Jaipur and others, (1970) I Labour & Industrial Cases 251, a Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court was dealing with a similar question. The conclusion which they have recorded is that in case of a dispute pending under S. 19A the Act applies from the date of the decision and not from an earlier date.