Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.17 seconds)

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi Son Of Late Prashant Sethi ... on 20 April, 2011

In the light of dictum of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Pranay Sethi (supra), the claimants would be entitled for addition of 40% towards future prospects instead of 50% added by the Tribunal. Deduction of 1/4th of the assessed income towards personal and living expenses considering the number of dependents of the deceased and multiplier of '18' considering the age of the deceased as 25 years, are not disturbed. Thus, the claimants would be entitled for 13 compensation under the head of loss of dependency at Rs.17,01,000/- (Rs.7,500 + 40% x 12 x 18 x ¾).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 10133 - K Kannan - Full Document

Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram on 18 September, 2018

Insofar as the consortium is concerned, as per the dictum of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of Satinder Kaur (supra) and Magma General Insurance Company Ltd. (supra), claimant No.1 being wife of the deceased would be entitled to Rs.40,000/- towards spousal consortium, claimant No.2 being daughter of the deceased would be entitled to Rs.40,000/- towards parental consortium and claimants No.3 and 4 being parents of the deceased would be entitled to Rs.40,000/- each towards filial consortium. Besides, the claimants would be entitled to Rs.15,000/- each towards loss of estate and funeral expenses.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 4992 - I Malhotra - Full Document
1