Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (0.32 seconds)
Jai Ram Lal Verma vs State Of U.P. Thru. C.B.I., A.C.B., Lko. on 5 December, 2022 cites

Radheshyam Kejriwal vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 18 February, 2011

The Supreme Court relying on Radheyshyam Kejriwal Vs. State of West Bengal and another6 (for short ''Radheyshyam Kejriwal case), set aside the judgment of the High Court and Special Judge and discharged the appellant from the offence under the Penal Code. The facts, therein, was that the employer SIDBI did not consider it a fit case, consequently, declined permission to prosecute the appellant. The Chief Vigilance Commission (CVC) after having gone through the arguments put forth by the CBI and SIDBI during the course of joint meeting was of the opinion that the appellant may have been negligent without any criminal culpability.
Supreme Court of India Cites 74 - Cited by 231 - C K Prasad - Full Document

C.B.I vs V.K. Bhutiani on 11 August, 2009

In Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. V. K. Bhutiani's case (supra), the Central Vigilance Commission had almost exonerated the delinquent employee and the High Court, placing reliance on report of the Vigilance Commission, had quashed the criminal proceedings against V. K. Bhutiani, the Supreme Court has held that the report of Central Vigilance Commission may be a relevant factor, but it cannot be held to be "be all or end all" in the matter for prosecuting accused persons of such serious offence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 25 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next