Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)Section 91 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Tulsi & Ors vs Chandrika Prasad. & Ors on 24 August, 2006
Further, in view of Section 91 of Indian Evidence Act, the contents of
the writings of document cannot be proved, otherwise then proving the
document itself. Further, it is based on "best evidence rule", in view of
judgment in Case Tulsi vs. Chandrika Prasad,(2006) 8 SCC 322.
Mohinder Singh & Anr vs State Of Haryana on 5 March, 1974
Further, in case Mahinder Singh vs. State of Haryana, (1974) SCC 285 ,
Hon'ble Supreme Court has held to the effect that oral evidence which runs
counter to an admission, contained in writing signed by a party weak piece of
evidence and cannot be accepted as such.
Kanshi Nath Ram Nath Dharmarth Trust vs Subhash Chand Gupta on 10 November, 2008
Further, in case Kashi Nath Chatterjee vs. Chandi Chand Banerjee,
(1866) SCC Online Cal 66, Full Bench of Hon'ble High Court has held as
under:-
1