Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.35 seconds)

Smt. Bishekha Devi & Anr. vs Mohd. Afsar & Ors. on 30 October, 2012

Vide separate order announced in the open court today, the petition stands allowed. The respondent No.3/Insurance company is hereby directed to pay the compensation of Rs.5,33,500/­ within one month to the petitioner no.2 (mother of deceased). Following the judgment of Smt. Bishekha Devi & Anr. Vs. Mohd. Afsar & Ors. MAC. APP. 1087/2012 passed by Hon'ble Delhi High Court, the Insurance Company shall also pay interest @ 9% p.a. on the total compensation amount from the date of petition till realization to the petitioners.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 303 - G P Mittal - Full Document

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Kashmiri Lal And Ors. on 9 December, 2005

In case, the Insurance Company fails to deposit this compensation with proportionate interest, in that event, in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Kashmiri Lal, 2007 ACJ 688, this compensation shall be recovered by attaching the bank account of the Insurance Company with a cost of Rs.10,000/­.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1437 - M Mudgal - Full Document

Shyamvati Sharma & Ors vs Karam Singh & Ors on 13 July, 2010

In view of the judgments in Manasvi Jain Vs. DTC, II (2014) ACC 420 (SC) and another judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Shyamwati Sharma & Ors. Vs. Karam Singh & Ors., V (2010) SLT 328, after necessary deductions of conveyance allowance, as per Ex.PW1/A and PW1/B which shows his revised annual salary as Rs.4,01,400/­ w.e.f. 01.04.2007, his salary is taken as Rs. 3,91,800/­ per annum (Rs.4,01,400.00 - Rs.9,600.00). After deduction of Tax of Rs.19,000/­, the same comes to Rs.3,72,800/­ per annum.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 155 - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Shyam Singh & Ors on 4 July, 2011

21.In view of judgments rendered in "Sarla Verma & Ors. Vs. DTC & Anr., (2009) ACJ 1298", "National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shyam Singh & Ors., (2011) 7 SCC 65" and in "HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Lalta Devi & Ors. decided on 12.01.2015 by Hon'ble Delhi High Court", while assessing the dependency in case of death of an unmarried, the multiplier of 5 shall be applicable. The age of the Smt. Neelam Passi, mother of deceased is to be taken as 65 years as per Ration Card Ex.PW1/C as on the date of accident.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 189 - M Sharma - Full Document

Reshma Kumari & Ors vs Madan Mohan & Anr on 2 April, 2013

22.In HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Lalta Devi & Ors. (Supra), in which the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Reshma Kumari & Ors. Vs. Madan Mohan & Anr., (2013) 9 SCC 65 and in Union of India & Ors. Vs. S.K. Kapoor, (2011) 4 SCC 589 and further of The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Harpal & Others, MAC APP 138/11 decided on 06.09.2013 were discussed and the three Judge Bench Decision in Reshma Kumari & Ors. (Supra) was held to be taken as a binding precedent on the aspect of future prospects.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 2700 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs S.K.Kapoor on 16 March, 2011

22.In HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Lalta Devi & Ors. (Supra), in which the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Reshma Kumari & Ors. Vs. Madan Mohan & Anr., (2013) 9 SCC 65 and in Union of India & Ors. Vs. S.K. Kapoor, (2011) 4 SCC 589 and further of The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Harpal & Others, MAC APP 138/11 decided on 06.09.2013 were discussed and the three Judge Bench Decision in Reshma Kumari & Ors. (Supra) was held to be taken as a binding precedent on the aspect of future prospects.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 532 - Full Document
1   2 Next