Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.23 seconds)
Velivelli Sydulu vs Guntupalli Venkateswarlu on 22 June, 1964 cites

Munisami Goundan vs Kutti Mooppan And Ors. on 10 February, 1933

(19) Our learned brother had observed, after looking into the document Ex. B. 4, that there was an endorsement on the back of it acknowledging the debt. It the debt was acknowledged in time by the father, even if the partition suit was a bona fide one, the soon could not escape the liability. A Hindu son is liable for a debt on promissory note executed by his father before partition and kept alive by an acknowledgment made by him after partition. This proposition is vouched by the case of Muniswami Goundan v. Kutti Mooppan, ILR 56 Mad 833: (AIR 1933 Mad 708).
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1