Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.33 seconds)
Aviva Life Insurance Co. India Ltd vs Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility ... on 1 November, 2017 cites

Life Insurance Corporation Of India vs Smt. Narinder Kaur Batra And Ors. on 6 August, 2003

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and after examining the record, am of the considered opinion that there is no merit in the present petition because learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to point out that there is any bar in obtaining the insurance policy while having the insurance policies from other insurance companies as well. He could not cite any decision contrary to the one rendered in the case of Narinder Kaur Batra and others (Supra) followed by the PLA.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

P.C. Chacko And Another vs Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation ... on 20 November, 2007

He has rather relied upon the 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 06-11-2017 22:52:28 ::: No.24733 CWP No. 24733 of 2017 -3- decision in the case of P.C. Chacko and another (Supra) and Satwant Kaur Sandhu (Supra) to canvass that the suppression of material fact would lead to repudiation of the claim. The said judgments are not applicable to the facts of this case because in both the cases, there was suppression of pre- ailment which ultimately led to the death whereas in the present case there is no evidence brought on record that the deceased was suffering from any pre-ailment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 351 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Satwant Kaur Sandhu vs New India Assurance Company Ltd on 10 July, 2009

He has rather relied upon the 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 06-11-2017 22:52:28 ::: No.24733 CWP No. 24733 of 2017 -3- decision in the case of P.C. Chacko and another (Supra) and Satwant Kaur Sandhu (Supra) to canvass that the suppression of material fact would lead to repudiation of the claim. The said judgments are not applicable to the facts of this case because in both the cases, there was suppression of pre- ailment which ultimately led to the death whereas in the present case there is no evidence brought on record that the deceased was suffering from any pre-ailment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 608 - D K Jain - Full Document
1