Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.27 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemption ... vs M/S Reham Foundation Kandhari Lane Lal ... on 26 September, 2019

(emphasis supplied by us) 5 ITA No.- 304 & 305/Del/2026 Social Welfare Public Trust 5.1 The Ld. AR also relied upon the decision of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) vs. Reham Foundation LKO (supra) to submit that if the Tribunal is satisfied with the conditions attached to the grant of registration to the assessee trust u/s 12 A of the Act, then the Tribunal could direct registration of Trust without remanding the matter to the Ld. CIT(E). The above plea of the assessee has been carefully considered but not found to be acceptable as the facts are distinguishable in the present case. In the case before the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court, the CIT(E) had refused to accept application for registration of Trust u/s 12AA of the Act, after recording his findings on the basis of materials on record before him holding that activities and objects of the trust were not genuine but the Tribunal on the basis of same material on record came to conclusion that the order of the CIT(E) was perverse since it was passed ignoring, misconstrued or misinterpreting such evidence. On the other hand, in the present case the Supplementary Trust Deed by which 'Irrevocable' clause was incorporated on 01.12.2025 by the settlor in the principal deed executed on 15.01.1981 was not before the Ld. CIT(E), when the Ld. CIT(E) rejected the application of the assessee. Therefore, the facts are distinguishable in the present case and therefore, the decision relied upon by the assessee will not be applicable in the given facts of the case of the assessee.
Allahabad High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Intellectuals Forum, Tirupathi vs State Of A.P. & Ors on 23 February, 2006

In Intellectuals Forum, Tirupathi v. State Of A.P And Others (AIR 2006 SC 1350), the Hon'ble Supreme Court noted that property subject to a public trust must be held available for use by the general public and cannot be sold or diverted from its particular use. The cy-près doctrine is the specific legal tool that applies this philosophy to charitable endowments. In this case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has emphasized that public/charitable property must not be allowed to be diverted and must remain perpetually dedicated to public benefit.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 305 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document
1