Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.41 seconds)

Sri.Dinakara Suvarna vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax on 8 July, 2022

771 & 772/Bang/2017 AY 2006-07 vide order dated 26.10.2023  Karnataka High Court in Sri Dinakara Suvarna Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in Income Tax Appeal No.16/2015 on 08.07.2022  Bombay High Court in the case of M/s. Aditi Constructions Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. in Writ Petition No.783/2016 dated 04.05.2023  Shyam Sunder Khandelwal V/s. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 2  Samanthapudi Lavanya Vs ACIT, In ITA No. I.T.A.No.704Niz/2019 to 706/Viz/2019 AY 2019-10 to 2011-12  ITO vs. Vikram Sujitkumar Bhatia, reported in (2023)453 ITR 417  Rajat Saurabh Chatterji v. ACIT ITA NO. 2430/De1/2015
Karnataka High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - P S Kumar - Full Document

Income Tax Officer vs Vikram Sujitkumar Bhatia on 6 April, 2023

771 & 772/Bang/2017 AY 2006-07 vide order dated 26.10.2023  Karnataka High Court in Sri Dinakara Suvarna Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in Income Tax Appeal No.16/2015 on 08.07.2022  Bombay High Court in the case of M/s. Aditi Constructions Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. in Writ Petition No.783/2016 dated 04.05.2023  Shyam Sunder Khandelwal V/s. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 2  Samanthapudi Lavanya Vs ACIT, In ITA No. I.T.A.No.704Niz/2019 to 706/Viz/2019 AY 2019-10 to 2011-12  ITO vs. Vikram Sujitkumar Bhatia, reported in (2023)453 ITR 417  Rajat Saurabh Chatterji v. ACIT ITA NO. 2430/De1/2015
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 8 - M R Shah - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 vs Jet Airways (I) Ltd. on 12 January, 2015

" 7. Section 147 provides that if the Assessing Officer has reasons to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year, he may, subject to the provisions of Sections 148 to 153, assess or reassess such income "and also any other income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment and which comes to his notice subsequently in the course of proceedings under this section." Explanation 3 to Section 147 inserted by Finance Act 2009 specifically provides that the "Assessing Officer may assess or reassess the income in respect of any issue, which has escaped assessment, and such issue has come to the ITA Nos.1614 to 1616/Bang/2024 Page 25 of 29 notice subsequently in the course of proceedings under this section, notwithstanding that the reasons for such issue have not been included in the reasons recorded under such Section 2 of Section 148". Elaborating upon the scope of these provisions, and dealing with the question whether any addition can be made on account of issues other than the issue in respect of which reasons for reopening have been recorded in a situation in which no additions are made for the reasons recorded, Hon'ble Bombay High Court, in the case of CIT v. Jet Airways (I.) Ltd. [2011] 331 ITR 236/[2010] 195 Taxman 117, has observed as follows :--
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 257 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next