Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.20 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Hiten P. Dalal vs Bratindranath Banerjee on 11 July, 2001
9. It is a settled legal position that under the scheme of
Negotiable Instruments Act, a statutory presumption has been created in
favour of the holder of the negotiable instrument in due course Section 139
stipulates that the court shall presume liability of the drawer of the cheque
for the amount for which the charge is drawn & Section 118 envisages that
unless the contrary is proved, it shall be presumed that the negotiable
instrument including a cheque has been drawn for consideration. [Ref : 2001
V AD(SD) 260 Hiten P. Dalal Vs. Bratindranath Banerjee].
Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 204 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Bharat Barrel And Drum Manufacturing ... vs Amin Chand Payrelal on 18 February, 1999
Pine Product Industries And Anr. vs R.P. Gupta And Sons And Anr. on 6 December, 2006
Thus, the complaint suffers from clear vagueness and on this
count alone, the complaint is required to be rejected. The Hon'ble High Court
of Delhi had acquitted an accused on the ground of vagueness of the
complaint in the decision of Pine Product Industries and Another v. R.P.
Gupta and Sons, II (2007) BC 20.
1