Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.22 seconds)Indra Sarma vs V.K.V.Sarma on 26 November, 2013
8. The above paragraph will not apply to the facts of this case, reason being, the marriage and family are social institution of vital importance. Paragraph 24 of the said decision reads as follows:
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Special Marriage Act, 1954
On The Death Of Abdul Khalique Borbhuiya ... vs Basir Uddin & Ors on 28 May, 2015
12. However, recently the Division Bench of this Court in Writ C No.19795 of 2021 (Shayara Khatun@ Shaira Khatun and another vs. State of U.P. and others) decided on 26.10.2021 has held as under:
Smt Aneeta And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 29 July, 2021
15. The factual scenario will not permit us to grant prayer 'A' as it would be against the very tenets of marital life of people. The personal autonomy rather than notion of social morality can be looked into but not at the stage when there is less period of cohabitation. There is no threat perception and no such complaint has been made to the police authority. Reference can also be had to the Division Bench of this Court penned by one of us (Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker) in Writ C No. 14443 of 2021 (Smt. Aneeta and another vs. State of U.P. and others) decided on 29.7.2021.
Rafique Dawood Kara Memon Popatiya vs Public Information Officer, Lok Sabha ... on 18 November, 2019
9. In the light of the aforesaid, it cannot be said that the relationship outside the matrimony has also to be recognized under Indian law. Paragraph 52 of the said judgment categorically mentions that Live-in relation as such is a relation which has not been socially accepted in India unlike many other Countries.
1