Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)Section 84 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 103 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Pandurang Babu Parab vs Mahadaji Moreshvar Gokhale on 8 September, 1902
In Bombay High Court, a case on similar facts came up in Pandurang v. Mahadaji ILR 27 Bom 23. Jenkins, C. J., who delivered the judgment of the Bench, observed :
Suppan Chettiar, S/O Adaikalam ... vs Rangan Chetty And Ors. on 10 August, 1937
12. A Bench of the Madras High Court had also similar facts to consider in Suppan Chettiar v. Rangan Chetty AIR 1938 Mad 405. Their Lordships held :
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Appa Pai (Dead) And Ors. vs Somu And Anr. on 4 February, 1925
In Madras High Court, a similar view was taken by Odgers, J. in Appa Pai v. Somu AIR 1925 Mad 1017. His Lordship said that, unless a mortgagor, depositing money under Section 83 of the Transfer of Property Act, procured the appointment of a guardian ad litem for the minor mortgagee cited by him, he cannot be held to have done all that was necessary for him to do in order to enable the mortgagee to draw the money.
1